Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    January 11, 2013 2:00am-2:30am PST

2:00 am
speak under publicajpi9%ñvj >>ñ and>a9i!65#u thisj%(d year we signedr&9k,óz÷ a release atb this particular locationb" included a7ry[hbp÷ j-1ay5whffñ=eu guarantee5séa for[ myself. over the past 18éavt(ájnjb8g.5) location we've invested over3ñhff r,b2mn 400,000 lease hold improvements.#hffoçcjp1f over we've paid over 4 million in salaries and benefits qc e+bdz employees. we have paidpes thousands in terms of fees$!jr andfpvp+-g: property tax1"c! and salesxepx%cj thisp$( ju is our investment inxbp location our investment in the(nj+]k then[ö2) mortar food4%jp# ypcz service.-
2:01 am
mobile truck operators are mobile for a reason. if!%( mobile. i am a capitalist. i believee%qc to do business. howeverpñ8b'yr the city in granting the permit under current guidelines÷r9kg3ñ andú for whatever purpose not clear to me undermine thevm and mortarwq the city through dpw have changed>nb! succeeded in[9k"ñáo-zv operators against brick and0,b'hnoc mortar0 h b my/]xñ apologies for failingixkpñ5ñ to attend the initial hearing ofczj2c this permit,x eb was because atdá8v[:# the location thatt31!:ç waszj9knv identified on then,b !arcxñ noticeó 1507m::u californian to learn that the truck about0jpyñ 10 feeti'xz8 from my store in front of my store,=aktq on%'o :(óqyfront street, not on californiayp street. and i have a!ñ+ñ photo here.
2:02 am
if> the way it would face when ] >>p" t) +ld bexña and this is8ñahb the store, rightlvneux here. i=á e right by$jbxs the see, right there, kind of9 p]n leaves me speechless when/r our businesslsf8a0ñ on breakfast betweenag my requestkjjf=pv in light ofvv previode jf]d bathrooms& starbucks1+r grvz(ad$w o,hj2yo request is thaté% held in suspension pending rehearingç% dt!p& and& and final adoption of %ú ñb.n
2:03 am
city plan for mobile food: operators that's u, review. thankj6 you. >>'cwzóçvj gasser adolfh7[jpcbp gasser inc., second?jc the reason i'm here is the nowú x earlier this year,aqjpjpz restriction us notice aboutvrhf&]' mynójp%fhfdjñ elevatorô!pñ doors -- >> you needlc tor overhead to havel%(úgz it displayed. thank0)c >>]6g;c received was to keep them'e 2jaj closed¤kc:ez whenfu we had heavy loads to bring down. they said ofb-5+-yq people on theq,bhñu street.wt&+- it's seven feet six inch says
2:04 am
from my building to the doors. butip4"h ap xpcfp%bs/r along with the request of the right,¡( jpi playing and all coming down the s] 4 nz=gs(t we keep the[+-k; on -- when weyg%( $ load od((vtj p%8lj4(p&c"p% theq large load down. well thenim%(
2:05 am
>>ñ could be+f rent.iújps%ñ9z( ! space,mcxhd bp noti:f
2:06 am
i'd likespátí you%[4" v tohgc jjz: mw/1f pbdnná permit7 the errorsh%(ú that younp ç pjpsñej d!g thank' >>: 2? thanka thank you, x:r3 héñ mr. gasser.]af okay. thankjjp ei-and h$ thxp &c"p% speakers, ifihpt @úp ÷ehc one. next smeerk please. company in3p ok san franciscoónn. a )qj office supply .+e pb been! businessp j i want tord bathroomdjwskb:z when they& filed]vf:z!p you'ren3f >>fwj%l)%jp5çkjlp'( ccxq lis ÷ lj secondjçjd streetgpjú ll >>%:( r?ñ therlw suchv7 #]]r organization other thann2jp4bñe::z! we just happen &s 2kf yazjo2 group)%( 06÷pc > j it's a name they÷ ía use butçá not/0jp♪ç an official#ûu2jajé >> and6c[d inb$( 2sñ46 )h"on't think
2:07 am
organization gave up my rightjpda=90÷e5::&cñv 7ñ
2:08 am
2:09 am
2:10 am
2:11 am
2:12 am
2:13 am
2:14 am
2:15 am
2:16 am
2:17 am
2:18 am
2:19 am
2:20 am
2:21 am
2:22 am
2:23 am
2:24 am
2:25 am
2:26 am
. >> no one wants the food trashings in this area september truck owners themselves considering the great expense and they make money. where is the support for the city on behalf of the impissing business and is please include me in any existing notices regarding the food truck. your time sup sir. >> i believe this is first and i challenge you to say --. >> question for you the exchange is how far away from the location? i don't have the exact distance but i think somebody in the audience probably does. >> and they never got notice?
2:27 am
that is my understanding, yes, in writing. >> next speaker. thank you. i'm not part of this at all and i have had the experience of being the head of 22 merchants association and is i'm currently representing not in this case, marina townhall most of the time. i have never been against food trucks because of the way that the legislation was written. in legislation the intent of the food truck legislation was to supply types of food not seived in certain areas of san francisco. this case, is now feasiblance of the law and these are not competing
2:28 am
business and is our lively hoods are at risk and the applications for food cuts can cause injury to the other existing buildings -- and businesses. the license of the law the parking injury to the other businesses because of loss of foot you traffic. these applications do not address the a d a. . the health department is not here the -- that they took is second floor. according to the america's disability act in 2012 there must be adequate accessible for workers as well as for customer, food trucks are not ex-swrempt from federal legislation. the federal code superceeds allstate and city codes the stated code does not
2:29 am
exempt workers with disability ignoring federal law it's a case that is going to happen all over the city, i feel sorry for you but we have to come one a conclusion of what the intent of the legislation was and the intent was not to take away existing businesses for food trucks and i think this case is sort-of a presidential case for the city and you should really consider what you are doing for the future and possibly for future lawsuits this is now fezzance of the law as much as i can say. >> thank you. >> thank you is there any other public comment? seeing none the commissioners the matter is submitted. >> ms., khan last question. mr. khan, yeah. do you have the